CUT-THE-CABLE.COM

June 30, 2009

Comcast and TW Plot Against Internet TV

The tw biggest CABLE MAFIA  giants have teamed up to limit internet TV content to only their cable TV subscribers.  Read all about it at GIGAOM “The first test of the new system, which will authenticate cable subscribers online and make available programs on the Web for no additional charge, will be announced Wednesday, between [...]

The tw biggest CABLE MAFIA  giants have teamed up to limit internet TV content to only their cable TV subscribers.  Read all about it at GIGAOM

“The first test of the new system, which will authenticate cable subscribers online and make available programs on the Web for no additional charge, will be announced Wednesday, between Comcast and Time Warner. The trial will involve about 5,000 Comcast subscribers, and television shows from the Time Warner networks TNT and TBS.”

Can anyone say ANTI-TRUST?


June 12, 2009

Comcast ‘Thumbs its Nose’ at Eugene

Read the story at KPTV.com Check this out…Comcast didn’t like the city of Eugene RAISING THEIR RATES for utility permit fees.  They didn’t think it was fair, so they took it to court and guess what happened…THE COURT AGREED! HOLY DOUBLE-STANDARD BATMAT!  It’s OK for Comcast to raise their rates on their customers whenever they [...]

Read the story at KPTV.com

Check this out…Comcast didn’t like the city of Eugene RAISING THEIR RATES for utility permit fees.  They didn’t think it was fair, so they took it to court and guess what happened…THE COURT AGREED!

HOLY DOUBLE-STANDARD BATMAT!  It’s OK for Comcast to raise their rates on their customers whenever they feel like if for whatever reason.  All I can say is that Comcast must be greasing the right palms.  Someone find out the name of that judge and we’ll find out what’s REALLY going on here!

Class Action Lawsuit Against Comcast on the Horizon

Read all about it at CEDMagazine.com Another suit has been filed against Comcast over required set-top box leases.  Alabama resident Gloria Cordier and her attourney Stephen Mullins filed in Mobile’s federal court claiming that Comcast is violating the Sherman Antitrust Act by forcing customers to pay a monthly rental fee for a set-top box in order [...]

Read all about it at CEDMagazine.com

Another suit has been filed against Comcast over required set-top box leases.  Alabama resident Gloria Cordier and her attourney Stephen Mullins filed in Mobile’s federal court claiming that Comcast is violating the Sherman Antitrust Act by forcing customers to pay a monthly rental fee for a set-top box in order to watch premium channels.

This is the seconds suit of this type in less than one month.  The other was initiated by Gordon Ramey of West Virginia.  The individual filings could likely be consolidated into a single class action suit.

We salute Gordon, Gloria, and all of the brave man and women that choose to take action rather than passively allow Comcast to pick their pockets on a daily basis.  If these do turn into a class action, there will be an opportunity for lots more to join in on the fun. 

THE LAWYERS WILL WANT TO SETTLE to get a fat check while the members of the class each end up with a check for something like $2.17…NOTHING DOING!!!  We want COMCAST out of the Cable Box rental business, and preferably out of business all together.

June 11, 2009

Verizon Accuses Comcast of False Advertising

…and hit them with a “cease and desist” letter.  Read the details at Philly.com Verizon says that Comcast’s ad claimimng that ”a comparable triple-play bundle of TV, phone and Internet service from Verizon can cost $400 more a year, after promotions expire, than one from Comcast” is outright false and Verizon would challenge the advertisements’ truthfulness [...]

…and hit them with a “cease and desist” letter.  Read the details at Philly.com

Verizon says that Comcast’s ad claimimng that ”a comparable triple-play bundle of TV, phone and Internet service from Verizon can cost $400 more a year, after promotions expire, than one from Comcast” is outright false and Verizon would challenge the advertisements’ truthfulness through the National Advertising Division of the Councils of Better Business Bureaus if Comcast failed to change them.

Comcast responded with the “They did it first!” defense.

Regardless of all of this BS, remember that this is nothing more than SMOKE & MIRRORS.  There is no real competition between these companies.  The higher-ups of all of these companies colluded long ago against the consumers that they will not compete on price!  That would eat into their profits.  It’s all about market share now.

The only way to bust their model is to CUT-THE-CABLE, (and have a nice day!)

Chattanooga Tolerates Comcast Rip-Offs

Lady Walker of Signal Mountain writes this opinion piece in The Chattanoogan.com Latest update from Comcast. If you have cable, from today on you will only be able to access local channels—nothing more. From this point forward you must rent boxes from Comcast at $1.99 per box per month plus taxes. They will generously, out [...]

Lady Walker of Signal Mountain writes this opinion piece in The Chattanoogan.com

Latest update from Comcast. If you have cable, from today on you will only be able to access local channels—nothing more. From this point forward you must rent boxes from Comcast at $1.99 per box per month plus taxes. They will generously, out of the goodness of their hearts, (sarcasm intended) give 2 boxes per household at no cost. Not to mention that they have been moving all of their channels upwards in the higher numbers over the past months so that you must also purchase an additional digital service package.

When I called Comcast a couple of months ago, I was told not to worry, that as long as we had Comcast service, there would be no problem with our televisions (true, they just didn’t tell you that the price of playing poker is going up and that they are holding all of the aces). Now things have changed so that Comcast has deviated from the FCC plan for digital conversion, and this is their way of generating additional income from their subscribers. I was told today that this new plan will allow Comcast to provide faster internet signals and additional HD channels. When I asked when this would occur and at what additional costs I was told that information wasn’t available.
I also asked if things changed again and we would no longer need these additional boxes, would Comcast notify us. I was told yes that Comcast always notifies their customers of price decreases (true again, they NEVER decrease their prices and the customers NEVER get notified). I guess that’s why I never saw anything in the billing memos, because when was the last time Comcast lowered prices and still provided decent functioning services at a lower rate? (sorry, more sarcasm)

So, pay for your expanded cable service, pay for your additional boxes and pay more later for your internet and additional HD channels. Basically, we are being held for ransom by Comcast pirates. I really hope that EPB’s new fiber optic system can come through and give local consumers a choice for our television services.

Aren’t these Chattanoogans nice people?  They obviously understand that they are being BENT OVER by Comcast and their response is sarcasm, and MORE sarcasm (and then they apologize for it)!  Do you ever wonder why companies like Comcast choose these “nice” communities to pilot their new SCREW THE CUSTOMER campaigns?

HEY CHATTANOOGA…WAKE UP!!!  You have other options.  You can get free TV from your antenna (the picture quality is superior to Comcast on their best day), or just simply CUT-THE-CABLE.  At least go out and buy yourselves a jar of Vaseline…Geez.

June 10, 2009

Comcast: #2 in the Hall of Shame

See the results of the latest MSN Money-Zogby International Poll at MSN.COM Comcast came in second only to AOL in having the WORST CUSTOMER SERVICE of any company in every industry.  That is quite an accomplishment for TWO YEARS RUNNING! “I’m not happy about it,” said Rick Germano, Comcast’s senior vice president of customer operations.  [...]

See the results of the latest MSN Money-Zogby International Poll at MSN.COM

Comcast came in second only to AOL in having the WORST CUSTOMER SERVICE of any company in every industry.  That is quite an accomplishment for TWO YEARS RUNNING!

“I’m not happy about it,” said Rick Germano, Comcast’s senior vice president of customer operations.  Rick…you need to embrace your suckiness.

“We are definitely seeing improvement,” Germano said. “It’s going to take a while for customers to actually believe it.”  Don’t worry Rick, I believe it now.  I predict that Comcast will come in FIRST PLACE in the Hall of Shame next year.

 

Comcast has agents using Twitter.  There are nearly a dozen workers (whoop-dee-doo) who spend their days scanning the blogosphere for reports of problems. “If they see a post, they’ll say, ‘I’m from Comcast. Can I help?’” spokeswoman Jenni Moyer said.  You know, Jenni has a point.  I mean…isn’t that what it’s all about?  Having someone care enough to ask if they can help?  Never mind that there is ZERO FOLLOW THRU for unsuspecting TWITS that fall for the gag.  It’s the thought that counts…right Jenni?

June 9, 2009

Comcast Forces Internet Subscribers to Use their DNS Servers

Here’s one for the extreme Internet techies.  ***WARNING*** The author uses some harsh language in the original post. We’ve all experienced the annoying Internet redirection tricks folks like Comcast play, when you mistype a site name and you end up on an annoying advertising page because their DNS server resolves it to their own server?  Well, it’s [...]

Here’s one for the extreme Internet techies.  ***WARNING*** The author uses some harsh language in the original post.

We’ve all experienced the annoying Internet redirection tricks folks like Comcast play, when you mistype a site name and you end up on an annoying advertising page because their DNS server resolves it to their own server?  Well, it’s worse than you think.

Internet techies have been able to avoid this obnoxious behavior by pointing to another DNS server.  But Comcast has put a stop to that.  What they do is to take any UDP traffic bound for port 53 on any server and redirect it to their own server.  This means that you simply can’t use a different DNS server, even if you have one.

The author goes on to show how he PROVED that this is taking place.  So much for NET NEUTRALITY!

Chalk up another one for the SQUIRRELS at Comcast

banjosquirrel1

Powered by WordPress